Statistics of trace gas inversions

It follows from the theme of Inverse Problems in Atmospheric Constituent Transport: inversion needs to be addressed in terms of statistical estimation, that statistical studies will continue to be an important part of development of inverse calculations.

A number of MASCOS projects continue such studies:

Ongoing research

Statistical diagnostics of CO2 inversions: Abstract submitted for AGU fall meeting

I.G.Enting [MASCOS] and
A.M. Michalak (presenter) [19 EWRE Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125]

Over the last decade, Bayesian synthesis inversion has become the most common technique for interpreting global-scale spatial distributions of CO2. While the technique is formally based on statistical estimation, in few of the studies has there been any testing of the statistical model. The development of techniques has been a sequence of ad hoc adjustments in the light of problems experienced. This presentation describes a series of tests that revisit earlier calculations and investigate the extent to which problems could have been avoided if more comprehensive statistical testing had been adopted. These statistical tests can also be used in conjunction with current inversion studies, to evaluate whether results violate the assumptions inherent in the statistical model implemented. Problems such as biased priors, unrealistic covariance parameters, and residuals not following assumed distributions can be diagnosed.

The test case uses 12 ocean regions, 4 regions of deforestation, 8 regions each of CO2 fertilisation and seasonal CO2 exchange. Fossil CO2 and oxidation of CO are treated separately. In the standard case, the distribution of normalised residuals is found to be consistent with the Gaussian distribution assumed in the statistical model. The distribution of normalised deviations of flux estimates from priors is found to have a smaller spread than expected from the notional statistical model. This is interpreted as a reflection of the common practice of using weak (minimally-informative) priors, informally regarding them as a regularization constraint rather than an equivalent source of information.

External links

Other on-line resources

Disclaimer

This page, its contents and style, are the responsibility of the author and do not represent the views, policies or opinions of The University of Melbourne.

Ian Enting: last change 29/5/06.